← Cases

Matthiessen v. Montecito County Water District

217 Cal. 788 Court Cal. Decision date 1933-04-03 Docket L. A. No. 12832 English

Contents

Majority

p. 788
[L. A. No. 12832.
In Bank.
April 3, 1933.]
F. W. MATTHIESSEN et al., Appellants, v. MONTECITO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (a County Water District), Respondent.
James F. Peck, Charles F. Blackstock and Elizabeth M. Maxwell for Appellants.
William P. Hubbard, as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Appellants.
J. F. Goux, City Attorney, Heaney, Price & Postel and W. G. Irving for Respondent.

The appeal in this case involves the same questions presented in the case of Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa Barbara, (L. A. No. 12834) ante, p. 673 [ 22 Pac. (2d) 5 ], this day decided, and by stipulation was submitted on the same briefs filed in that case. On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.

Preston, J., dissented.

Rehearing denied.