Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Gates v. Buckingham 4 Cal. 286

← Cases

Gates v. Buckingham

4 Cal. 286 Court Cal. English

Judges Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

Delivered by Mr. Ch. J. Murray

Contents

Majority

p. 286
MARY E. GATES v. CHARLES E. BUCKINGHAM.

Headnote

[1] Appeal, Aefirmanoe oe Judgment. — The notices and affidavits filed on an application to re-tax costs, were not embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement. Beld, that the judgment must be affirmed, upon the presumption that the Court below decided properly upon all the evidence before' it.
Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

p. 287
This appeal is presented from an order of the Court below re-taxing costs.

The record contains various notices and affidavits, which are not, however, embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement, so that we are uninformed upon what the Court acted. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, on the presumption that the Court below decided correctly upon all the evidence before it.