Faris v. Lampson — 73 Cal. 190

Majority

p. 190

[No. 11892.

Department One.

August 16, 1887.]

FANNIE FARIS et al., Respondents, v. DAVID LAMPSON et al., Appellants.

Headnote

Appeal—Failube op Appellant to File Points and Authorities— Affirmance without Examination of Record. —Where no oral argument is had, and the appellant fails to file any points or authorities, the judgment appealed from will he affirmed without an examination of the record.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County.

p. 191

The facts are stated, in the opinion.

Wesley K. Boucher, for Appellants.

J. A. Louttü, S. D. Woods, and A. L. Levinsky, for Respondents.

— In this case no oral argument was had, nor did the appellants file any points or authorities; and having thus omitted to point out the errors of which they complain, the judgment should be affirmed without an examination of the record. (Mokelumne H. C. M. Co. v. Woodbury, 10 Cal. 188 ; Edmondson v. Alameda Co., 24 Cal. 350 ; Holm v. Roach, 25 Cal. 37 ; Hickinbotham v. Monroe, 28 Cal. 489 ; Brewster v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 222 ; Estate of Montgomery, 59 Cal. 583 .)

Belcher, C. C., and Hayne, C., concurred.

— For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, judgment affirmed.

Cases cited

Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. Woodbury 10 Cal. 188 Cal. p. 191
Ex parte Burrill 24 Cal. 350 Cal. p. 191
Holm v. Roach 25 Cal. 37 Cal. p. 191
Hickinbotham v. Monroe 28 Cal. 489 Cal. p. 191
In re the Estate of Montgomery 59 Cal. 583 Cal. p. 191