Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Tomasini v. Superior Court of Del Norte Cty. 75 Cal. 225

← Cases

Tomasini v. Superior Court of Del Norte Cty.

75 Cal. 225 Court Department Two Decision date 1888-03-06 Docket No. 12511 English

Contents

Majority

p. 225
No. 12511.
Department Two
March 6, 1888.]
LOUIS TOMASINI et al., Petitioners, d. SUPERIOR COURT OF DEL NORTE COUNTY, Respondent.

Headnote

Certiorari—Insolvency—Order Appointing Attorney bob Absent? Creditor—Election ob Assignee.—Orders appointing an attorney to vote for an absent creditor at the election of an assignee in an insolvent proceeding, and appointing as assignee the person chosen at such election, even if erroneous, cannot he reviewed on cerliorm'i, as the court had jurisdiction of the proceeding.'
Application for a writ of certiorari. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
L. F. Cooper, and Sawyer & Burnett, for Petitioners.

—Writ of certiorari to review orders of

respondent appointing an attorney to vote for an absent creditor at the election of an assignee in an insolvent proceeding, and appointing as assignee the person chosen at such election.

If the petitioners were aggrieved at all by the action of the respondents, it was by the order confirming the election, and appointing the person selected assignee. But the court had jurisdiction of the proceeding; and the orders complained of, even if erroneous, cannot be reviewed on this writ. The prayer of the petitioner is denied and the writ dismissed.