← Cases

Cole v. Rush

40 Cal. 2d 178 Court Cal. Decision date 1953-01-20 Docket L. A. No. 22358 English

Contents

Majority

p. 178
[L. A. No. 22358.
In Bank.
Jan. 20, 1953.]
DOROTHEA COLE et al., Appellants, v. PAUL RUSH et al., Defendants; FRANK VAN STONE, Respondent.
John C. Stevenson and Lionel Richman for Appellants.
Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and A. P. G. Steffes for Respondent.

This is an appeal from ~n order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. Such an order is nonappealable (Evans v. Dabney (1951), 37 Cal.2d 758 , 759 [ 235 P.2d 604 ], and authorities there cited; 3 Cal.Jur.2d 476), and this court must, therefore, dismiss the appeal of its own motion. (Collins v. Corse (1936), 8 Cal.2d 123 , 124 [ 64 P.2d 137 ]; Estate of Brady (1948), 32 Cal.2d 478 , 480 [ 196 P.2d 881 ]; Rosenberg v. Knesboro (1947), 80 Cal.App.2d 36 , 38 [ 180 P.2d 750 ]; see, also, 4 Cal.Jur.2d 337, and cases there cited.)

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Cases cited