← Cases

Palmer v. Woodruff

30 Cal. App. 251 Court Third Appellate District. Decision date 1916-04-04 Docket Civ. No. 1533 English

Contents

Majority

p. 251
[Civ. No. 1533.
Third Appellate District.
April 4, 1916.]
GEORGE T. PALMER et al., Respondents, v. S. A. WOODRUFF, Appellant.

Headnote

Appeal — Failure to File Transcript — Dismissal.—Where more than, forty days have elapsed since an appeal from a judgment was perfected, and no transcript has been filed, or extension of time given within’ which to file such transcript, the appeal will be dismissed.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Welsh & Henry, for Appellant.
White, Miller, Needham & Harber, for Respondents.

Notice of appeal from the judgment in the above-entitled cause was served and filed by defendant on July 20, 1915. On July 23, 1915, undertaking on appeal was filed. September 16, 1915, bill of exceptions was duly settled, and on December 13, 1915, motion for new trial was denied. Appellant has made no request of the clerk of the superior court to certify to a correct or any transcript of the record, and no further proceedings have been had toward prosecuting the appeal.

More than forty days having elapsed since the appeal was perfected and no transcript having been filed or extension of time given within which to file such transcript, on motion of respondents the appeal from the judgment is dismissed.