Majority
p. 804[Civ. No. 2388. Second Appellate District. October 4, 1917.] WILLIAM E. BEECHAM, Respondent, v. C. Y. BURNS, City Clerk, Appellant.
Headnote
Election Law—Certification of Recall Petition.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Beecham, v. Bums, ante, p. 754.APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [ 168 Pac. 1058 ].
Charles W. Lyon, and Fredericks & Hanna, for Appellant.
Roy A. Linn, Muhleman & Crump, and William M. Humphreys, for Respondent.
This is said to be an action to compel appellant, as city clerk of the city of Venice, to certify to the sufficiency of a certain recall petition for the recall of one Carlos L. Smart, a trustee of that city. In all respects necessary to be considered for the purposes of a decision, this case is like No. 2387, Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [ 168 Pac. 1058 ], in which our decision is this day filed. Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment in this action is affirmed.