Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Taylor v. Board of Police Commissioners 36 Cal. App. 815

← Cases

Taylor v. Board of Police Commissioners

36 Cal. App. 815 Court First Appellate District. Decision date 1918-02-18 Docket Civ. No. 2123 English

Delivered by BEASLY, J., pro tem.

Contents

Majority

p. 815
[Civ. No. 2123.
First Appellate District.
February 18, 1918.]
CHARLES H. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Respondents.

Headnote

Municipal Corporations—Dismissal op Police Officers—San Francisco Charter.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of MaePhee v. Board of Police Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco et al., ante, p. 308.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Franklin A. Griffin, Judge.
The facts are identical with those stated in the opinion in the case of MacPhee v. Board of Police Commissioners of the City and County of San Frmcisco et al., ante, p. 308.
Nathan C. Coghlan, E. V. McKenzie, and A. L. O’Grady, for Appellant.
Geo. Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.

This ease is identical in all respects with that of MacPhee v. Board of Police Commissioners et al., ante, p. 308, [ 171 Pac. 1086 ], and upon the authority of that ease the judgment herein is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.