Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Fraser v. Cummings 48 Cal. App. 796

← Cases

Fraser v. Cummings

48 Cal. App. 796 Court First Appellate District, Division Two. Decision date 1920-07-14 Docket Civ. No. 3520 English

Contents

Majority

p. 796
[Civ. No. 3520.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
Two.July 14, 1920.]
L. C. ERASER, Petitioner, v. L. W. CUMMINGS, as City Clerk, etc., Respondent.

Headnote

[1] Elections — Becall—Suppiciency op Petition. — Petition denied and alternative writ discharged on the authority of Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504.
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel a city clerk to certify a recall petition. Petition denied and alternative writ discharged.
p. 797
This case presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504.
De Lancey C. Smith for Petitioner.
H. L. Hagan, City Attorney, and T. J. Ledwieh, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

— [1] The above-entitled cause presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504, [ 192 Pac. 100 ], and for the reasons therein given the petition is denied and the alternative writ discharged.