Majority
p. 797[Civ. No. 3541. First Appellate District, Division One. November 3, 1920.] SAMUEL BRASK et al., Respondents, v. FRANK BAR-NET, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Appellants. The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Brask v. Cox et al., ante, p. 721 [ 194 Pac. 292 ].
Headnote
[1] Quieting Title—Character op Conveyance—Findings—-Evidence. Judgment affirmed on the authority of Braok v. Cox et al., ante, p. 721.Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. A. F. St. Sure, Judge.
Affirmed.
F. A. Berlin for Appellants.
J. E. Hood and Chas. E. Snook for Respondents.
[1] The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of Brask v. Cox et al., ante, p. 721, [ 194 Pac. 292 ], and which are fully set forth in said decision, wherein the judgment was affirmed. It follows that the judgment herein must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.