Majority
Headnote
[l] Attorney at Law — Deprivation op License — Application por Reinstatement — Insufficiency of Period of Disbarment. — An attorney at law deprived of Ms license to practice upon being found guilty of offenses of the character described in subdivision 5 of section 287 of the Code of Civil Procedure has not been sufficiently punished for Ms acts merely by being deprived of his license for a period of only three years, and Ms application for reinstatement, although supported by numerous testimonials of present good character, must be denied.Petitioner, an attorney at law, licensed to practice in the state of California, was disbarred by judgment entered in the superior court of the county of Los Angeles on the twenty-seventh day of May, 1918. The offenses of which he was found guilty were of the character described in subdivision 5 of section 287 of the Code of Civil Procedure. He now applies for reinstatement, claiming that he is now and for a long time has been repentant for the wrongs committed by him and has lived an upright life since the time of his disbarment. The application is supported by the request of numerous persons who attest his good conduct and their confidence in his present good character.
[1] Without depreciating the value of these testimonials and without intimating that petitioner may not be reinstated
The petition is denied.