Majority
p. 411[Crim. No. 650. Third Appellate District. January 11, 1923.] THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ANTONE ZMAK, Appellant.
Headnote
[1] Criminal Law—Sale of Liquor in No-license Territory—Evidence—Verdict—Appeal.—On this appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crime" of “maintaining a place where alcoholic liquor is kept for sale and distribution” in no-license territory, although no briefs were filed and no appearance was made for appellant, an examination of the transcript showed that appellant was fairly tried and convicted on evidence which was conclusive of guilt.APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. H. L. Preston, Judge. Affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
M. H. Iversen and Will Van Dyke for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of the crime of “maintaining a place where alcoholic liquor is kept for sale and distribution” in no-license territory.
[1] The transcript on appeal was filed July 15, 1922. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellant. The appeal came on regularly for oral argument on the third day of January, 1923. No appearance was made for appellant.
An examination of the transcript shows that the appellant was fairly tried and convicted on evidence which was conclusive of guilt.
The judgment is affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.