Majority
p. 799[Civ. No. 3713. Second Appellate District, Division Two. March 5, 1923.] DAVID C. MANN, Respondent, v. INNER HARBOR LAND COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.
Headnote
[1] Vendor and Vendee—Condemnation Proceeding—Rescission.— Judgment affirmed on authority of Bunt v. Inner Barbor Land Co., ante, p. 271.APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Chas. S. Grail, Judge.
Affirmed.
The facts are substantially the same as those involved in Hunt v. Inner Harbor Land Co., ante, p. 271.
Daly, Daly & Todd and James H. Daly for Appellant.
Birney Donnell for Respondent.
H. S. Laughlin, as Amicus Curiae.
The facts are substantially the same as those involved in Hunt v. Inner Harbor Land Co., ante, p. 271 [ 214 Pac. 998 ]. [1] For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district- court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 4, 1923.