← Cases

People v. Ernsting

66 Cal. App. 797 Court Second Appellate District, Division One. Decision date 1924-03-27 Docket Crim. No. 1033 English

Delivered by HOUSER, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 797
[Crim. No. 1033.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
March 27, 1924.]
THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. FREDERICK ERNSTING, Respondent.

Headnote

[1] Railroad Commission—Operation op Auto-stage Lines—Jurisdiction — Pleading. — Judgment affirmed upon authority of People v. Hadley, ante, p. 370.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County. M. W. Conkling, Judge. Affirmed.
The facts are identical 'with those recited in People v. Hadley, ante, p. 370.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Erwin W. Widney, Deputy Attorney-General, and Ernest R. Utley, for Appellant.
Robert G. Hill for Respondents.
Hugh Gordon and Carl I. Wheat, as Amici Ouriae..

This is an appeal by the people of the state of California from a judgment in favor of defendant on a demurrer to an information which charged defendant with the violation of an order of the Railroad Commission of this state.

[1] The facts are identical with those recited in the case of People v. Hadley, ante, p. 370 [ 226 Pac. 836 ], and relying upon that case as an authority herein, it is ordered that the judgment be and the same is affirmed.

Conrey, P. J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 26, 1924.