Majority
p. 799[Civ. No. 4938. Second- Appellate District, Division, Two. March 7, 1925.] EMMA HOOPES et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.
Headnote
[1] Justice’s Court—Appeal—Delay in Bringing to Trial.—Peremptory writ of mandamus granted upon authority of Hoopes v. Superior Court, ante, p. 564.PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the dismissal of a Justice’s Court appeal.
Peremptory writ granted.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Thos. H. Cornett for Petitioners.
Gerecht & Hall, E. P. Gerecht and C. W. Hall for Respondents.
Petitioners herein were defendants in an action commenced in the justice’s court of Los Angeles township by one Jay Smith. [1] Otherwise the record before us in this proceeding is the same in all respects as that presented in Hoopes v. Superior Court, ante, p. 564 [ 235 Pac. 739 .]
The questions involved herein have been discussed and decided in the opinion filed in case numbered 4939 {ante, p. 564).
The peremptory writ of mandate is therefore -granted, and the Superior Court is directed to dismiss the appeal.
Finlayson, P. J., and Works, J., concurred.