Majority
p. 793[Civ. No. 3093. Third Appellate District. July 24, 1926.] C. H. THURMAN et al., etc., Appellants, v. LUCY A. RICHARDS, etc., Respondent.
Headnote
[1] School Law—High School Districts—Levy op Special Tax.— Judgment affirmed upon the authority of McDonald v. Richards, ante, p. 1.APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. J. 0. Moncur, Judge.
Affirmed.
p. 794Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe as Amici Curiae.
The facts present substantially the same questions as discussed and decided in McDonald v. Richards, ante, p. 1.
Orville C. Pratt, Jr., and George F. Jones for Appellants.
W. B. Rothe, District Attorney, and Bond & Deirup for Respondent.
[1] For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of McDonald v. Richards, ante, p. 1 [ 248 Pac. 1049 ], the judgment appealed from is affirmed.