Majority
p. 796[Civ. No. 3180. Third Appellate District. February 19, 1927.] W. I. WAGG, Appellant, v. JOHN HATCH et al., Respondents.
Headnote
[1] Promissory Notes.—Judgment affirmed on authority of Wagg v. Toler, 80 Cal. App. 501 .APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. J. B. Landis, Judge.
Affirmed.
The facts are similar to those involved in the ease of Wagg v. Toler, 80 Cal. App. 501 .
Gerald Willis Myers and Bigby & Myers for Appellant.
James S. Bennett for Respondents.
[1] This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants. The parties have filed herein the following stipulation:
"It is hereby stipulated . . . that the above-entitled case involves the same facts and circumstances as the case of Wagg v. Toler et al., 80 Cal. App. 501 [ 251 Pac. 973 ], and it is hereby stipulated that the above-entitled case may be submitted without oral argument for decision by the court, upon the authority of the opinion in Wagg v. Toler, supra, rendered December 28, 1926.”
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and on the authority of Wagg v. Toler, 80 Cal. App. 501 [ 251 Pac. 973 ], the judgment is affirmed.
Cases cited
- Wagg v. Toler 80 Cal. App. 501 p. 796