← Cases

Penland v. Golden

107 Cal. App. 2d 256 Court Second Dist., Div. One. Decision date 1951-11-05 Docket Civ. No. 18357 English

Delivered by HANSON, J. pro. tem.

Contents

Majority

p. 256
[Civ. No. 18357.
Second Dist., Div. One.
Nov. 5, 1951.]
ELLEDGE R. PENLAND, Appellant, v. NATHAN GOLDEN et al., Respondents.
Elledge R. Penland, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Major & Tenner and Jack Tenner for Respondents.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. (Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [ 176 P. 164 ].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Cases cited