Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta G. L. Tilden & Co. v. Superior Court 112 Cal. App. 2d 893

← Cases

G. L. Tilden & Co. v. Superior Court

112 Cal. App. 2d 893 Court First Dist., Div. Two. Decision date 1952-07-21 Docket Civ. No. 15288; Civ. No. 15289; Civ. No. 15290; Civ. No. 15291; Civ. No. 15292; Civ. No. 15293; Civ. No. 15294; Civ. No. 15295; Civ. No. 15296; Civ. No. 15297; Civ. No. 15298; Civ. No. 15299; Civ. No. 15300 English

Contents

Majority

p. 893
246 P.2d 697]
[Civ. No. 15288.
First Dist., Div. Two.
July 21, 1952.]
G. L. TILDEN AND COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; WALKUP DRAYAGE AND WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; MERCHANTS EXPRESS CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; HAGSTROM’S FOOD STORES, INC., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; HASLETT WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; MANNINGS, INC., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; J. A. CLARK DRAYING COMPANY, LTD., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent;
[Civ. No. 15289.
[Civ. No. 15290.
[Civ. No. 15291.
[Civ. No. 15292.
[Civ. No. 15293.
[Civ. No. 15294.
p. 894
HIGHWAY TRANSPORT INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; ROBERTSON DRAYAGE COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; FOSTERS LUNCH SYSTEM, LTD., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; UNION ICE AND STORAGE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; THE UNION ICE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; PENINSULA ICE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
[Civ. No. 15295.
First Dist., Div. Two.
July 21, 1952.]
[Civ. No. 15296.
[Civ. No. 15297.
[Civ. No. 15298.
[Civ. No. 15299.
[Civ. No. 15300.
Fabian D. Brown for Petitioners.
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Irving H. Perluss and William L. Shaw, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

The facts and issues in these proceedings are similar to those involved in John Breuner Co. v. Superior Court, Civ. No. 15287, ante, p. 304 [ 246 P.2d 694 ] this day decided. For the reasons therein stated the orders are affirmed.

Petitioners’ application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 18, 1952. Schauer, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.