Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Seaboard Surety Corp. v. Hollywood State Bank 16 Cal. App. 2d 757

← Cases

Seaboard Surety Corp. v. Hollywood State Bank

16 Cal. App. 2d 757 Court Second Appellate District, Division Two. Decision date 1936-09-11 Docket Civ. No. 11149 English

Delivered by CRAIL, P. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 757
[Civ. No. 11149.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
September 11, 1936.]
THE SEABOARD SURETY CORPORATION OF AMERICA (a Corporation), Appellant, v. HOLLYWOOD STATE BANK (a Corporation), Respondent.
Woodruff, Burr & Smith, Philip S. Ehrlich, Philip Grey Smith and L. 0. Hatch for Appellant.
Leonard Wilson and Joseph M. Argabrite for Respondent.

This case comes before us upon the respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground

p. 758
that the notice of appeal was not filed within the time required by law, the contention being that appellant was a day late, and that contention depending in turn on when the order of the trial court was entered in the minutes. The case is very similar to the case of Berman v. Blankenship Motors, 140 Cal. App. 134 [ 34 Pac. (2d) 1035 ], and on the authority of that case the motion is denied.

Wood, J., and Gould, J., pro tem,, concurred.

Cases cited