Majority
Defendant-appellant was convicted by a jury of violating section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code (possession of narcotics) on July 4, 1957. He admitted a prior conviction of said section in Riverside County. A motion for new trial was denied and he was sentenced to San Quentin prison.
Defendant lived in a nine-room house belonging to him and
Defendant’s wife testified she swept the bathroom floor daily and did not notice the presence of the match box and
The officers testified that lint and other dirt was found under the bathtub and there was no evidence that it had been swept for some time, and that the match box was not dusty.
The main claim on this appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to show knowledge of possession of the match box and its contents on the part of the defendant. It is true that a conviction for possession of narcotics requires proof of knowledge of the presence of the object as embraced within, the concept of “physical control with the intent to exercise such control.” (People v. Gory, 28 Cal.2d 450 , 455 [ 170 P.2d, 433 ].) Knowledge, however, may be inferred from all the surrounding facts and circumstances. (People v. Torres, 98 Cal.App.2d 189 [ 219 P.2d 480 ]; People v. Gentry, 118 Cal.App.2d 501 , 503 [ 257 P.2d 1012 ].)
In the present case the surrounding facts and circumstances clearly permitted the fair and reasonable inference that the defendant had knowledge of the presence of the match box containing the narcotics under the bathtub. Apparently the jury disbelieved Reyes’s testimony, or believed that de-, fendant and Reyes had joint control and knowledge of its presence. (People v. Romero, 161 Cal.App.2d 404 [ 327 P.2d 205 ].)
Some complaint is made about the admission of the photograph in evidence as indicating that the match box was found near the bathtub and not behind some 2 by 4 casing under it. We see no merit to this claim since its placement was sufficiently explained to the jury.
Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.
Mussell, Acting P. J., and McCabe, J. pro tern.,[1] concurred.
Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 10, 1958.
* Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.
Cases cited
- People v. Gory 28 Cal.2d 450 at 455 p. 224
- People v. Torres 98 Cal.App.2d 189 p. 224
- People v. Gentry 118 Cal.App.2d 501 at 503 p. 224
- People v. Romero 161 Cal.App.2d 404 p. 224