Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co. 63 Cal. App. 2d 452

← Cases

Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.

63 Cal. App. 2d 452 Court Cal. Dist. Ct. App. Decision date 1944-03-23 Docket Civ. No. 3121 English

Delivered by GRIFFIN, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 452
[Civ. No. 3121.
Fourth List.
Mar. 23, 1944.]
WILETTA LAY, Respondent, v. PACIFIC PERFORATING COMPANY, LTD., (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.
p. 453
Sidney A. Moss for Appellants.
Claflin & Chain for Respondent.

A petition for writ of supersedeas was filed by defendants and appellants pending the appeal in the above entitled case. An order to show cause was issued and pending the hearing thereof all proceedings on the judgment were stayed conditioned that defendants file a sufficient bond in the sum of $6828. Such a bond was filed. The appeal from the judgment was decided adversely to defendants. (Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co., Ltd,., 62 Cal.App.2d 233 [ 144 P.2d 395 ].) A hearing was subsequently denied by the Supreme Court. That judgment has become final. The question presented under the writ has become moot.

Petition dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Cases cited