Majority
Headnote
Mining Ground — Eight of Occupant as Against Intruder. — One in actual possession of mining ground, although without title, may proceed against a mere intruder having no superior right of entry.— If the plaintiff established the actual possession of any portion of the mining ground in controversy at the time of the defendants’ entry, the nonsuit was improperly granted. As against a mere intruder, having no better right of entry than himself, if the plaintiff had the actual possession, he is entitled to be protected in it; and this court has had occasion in several eases to consider what acts of dominion will constitute an actual possession of mining' ground: English v. Johnson, 17 Cal. 107 , 76 Am. Dec. 574 ; Hess v. Winder, 30 Cal. 349 . I think the plaintiff brought himself clearly within the rule established in these eases as to a portion, if not to the whole, of the ground in contest. The testimony certainly tended strongly to establish the actual possession of the plaintiff as to a portion, at least, of the demanded premises; and this made out a prima facie case against the defendants as to this portion, at least. The nonsuit was improperly granted.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
We concur: Rhodes, C. J.; Wallace, J.; Sprague, J.; Temple, J.
Cases cited
- English v. Johnson 17 Cal. 107 p. 664
- Hess v. Winder 30 Cal. 349 p. 664