← Cases

Morrow v. Kingsbury

1 Cal. Unrep. 884 Court Cal. Decision date 1875-10-07 Docket No. 4504 English

Judges We concur: Crockett, J.; Niles, J.

Delivered by RHODES, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 884
T. G. MORROW, Respondent, v. JESSE KINGSBURY and JAMES WINKLER, Appellants.
No. 4504;
October 7, 1875.

Headnote

Public Land — Sixteenth. Section Granted to State. — Unless affected by some valid pre-emption right, the title to land included within a sixteenth section vested in the state, upon approval of the survey of the township, under the act of Congress granting sixteenth and thirty-sixth sections.
APPEAL from Tenth Judicial District, Colusa County.
J. T. Harrington and W. C. Belcher for respondent; L. J. Ashford for appellants.

— The title to the land in controversy (it being a portion of a sixteenth section) vested in the state upon the approval of the survey of the township, unless there existed a valid pre-emption right to the land acquired under the act of Congress of March 3, 1853, the act granting the sixteenth and thirty-sixth sections to the state: See Sherman v. Buick, 45 Cal. 665 .

The settlement, as appears by the declaratory statement, was not made until the year 1870, which was not within the time mentioned ion the act of March 3, 1853.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Crockett, J.; Niles, J.