Hyperlawhypertext legal database Williams v. Benicia Water Co. 2 Cal. Unrep. 342

← Cases

Williams v. Benicia Water Co.

2 Cal. Unrep. 342 Court Cal. Decision date 1884-07-18 Docket No. 9416 English

Contents

Majority

p. 342
WILLIAMS v. BENICIA WATER CO.
No. 9416;
July 18, 1884.
4 Pac. 382.

Headnote

Appeal—Bill of Exceptions—Motion for New Trial.—In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial will not be reviewed on appeal.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Solano County.
L. B. & L. Mizner for appellant; Jos. McKenna and Jos. F. Wendell for respondent.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions we cannot review the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, and the appellant does not insist that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or that the findings do not support the judgment.

Judgment and order affirmed.