Hyperlawhypertext legal database Doolan v. Cunningham 2 Cal. Unrep. 414

← Cases

Doolan v. Cunningham

2 Cal. Unrep. 414 Court Cal. Decision date 1884-12-08 Docket No. 8280 English

Contents

Majority

p. 414
DOOLAN and Others v. CUNNINGHAM, Administrator, etc.
No. 8280;
December 8, 1884.
4 Pac. 1193.

Headnote

Appeal.—The Use of the Word “Defendant” Instead of “Defendants” in conclusions of law, when clearly a clerical misprision, is not entitled to any regard on appeal.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.
George W. Tyler for respondents; Cary & Troutt for respondents.

We have examined the record in this case and find it without error. The use of the word “defendant” instead of “defendants,” in the conclusions of law, is so clearly a mere clerical misprision that we do not think it entitled to any regard. Judgment affirmed.