Hyperlawhypertext legal database Luco v. Commercial Bank 2 Cal. Unrep. 549

← Cases

Luco v. Commercial Bank

2 Cal. Unrep. 549 Court Cal. Decision date 1885-10-14 Docket No. 11,016 English

Contents

Majority

p. 549
LUCO v. COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAN DIEGO.[1]
No. 11,016;
October 14, 1885.
8 Pac. 274.

Headnote

Partition.—Unless Notice of an Appeal from an Interlocutory Decree in partition is served upon all the adverse parties the appeal will be dismissed.
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Diego County.
A. B. Hotchkiss for appellant; Levi Chase, W. J. Hunsaker and Thomas J. Arnold for respondent.

A motion is made to dismiss the appeal, which is from an interlocutory decree in partition, on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served on all of the adverse parties. As the notice was not so served, the motion must be granted. Ordered accordingly.