Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta San Francisco Savings Union v. Long 6 Cal. Unrep. 278

← Cases

San Francisco Savings Union v. Long

6 Cal. Unrep. 278 Court Cal. Decision date 1899-04-05 Docket S. F. No. 1041 English

Contents

Majority

p. 278
SAN FRANCISCO SAVINGS UNION v. LONG.[1]
S. F. No. 1041;
April 5, 1899.
56 Pac. 882.

Headnote

Appeal,—A Remittitur will not be Recalled where it conforms to the judgment as rendered, and it is too late to amend the judgment.

The motion to recall remittitur heretofore issued in this case is denied. It conforms to the judgment as rendered, and it is now too late to amend the judgment. The motion to amend our record nunc pro tunc, so as to show that the order made on the first day of November, 1898, was an order directing the amendment of the record by supplying the deficiency specified in. the plaintiff’s suggestion of diminution, is granted.