← Cases

Bryant v. Hawley

7 Cal. Unrep. 342 Court Court of Appeal, Second District; Decision date 1908-02-04 English

Delivered by *343 TAGGART, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 342
BRYANT v. HAWLEY.
Court of Appeal, Second District;
February 4, 1908.
94 Pac. 850.

Headnote

Appeal—Record.—In an Action on a Note Given for an Option to purchase lots, matters of testimony or exhibits constituting title or showing some kind o£ an agreement, as to which there is no mention in the record, cannot be considered on appeal from the judgment.[1]
APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; G. A. Gibbs, Judge.
Action by W. S. Bryant against C. 0. Hawley. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Job Harriman, Harriman & Spring and M. E. C. Munday for appellant; Waterman & Wood for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment. The action was on a promissory note executed by defendant to plaintiff and two other parties, who assigned their interests to plaintiff. Defendant by his verified answer denies that there is anything due or payable on the note, and alleges that it was given in payment of an option to purchase certain particularly described lots of land, which option to purchase he was induced to enter into by false and fraudulent representations as to the property made to him by the plaintiff. The court finds that the note was given for the option, but upon all the other issues finds in favor of plaintiff, and gives judgment in his favor.

The only points presented by appellant on the appeal relate to some matters of testimony or exhibits constituting title or showing some kind of an agreement, as to which there is no mention in the record. No question which this court can consider upon an appeal from a judgment is urged.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Allen, P. J.; Shaw, J.