Majority
THE Defendant was indicted at the Oyer and Terminer in Queen’s County for a Rape, and in the last Vacation he obtained from a Judge at his Chamber, an Allowance of a Certiorari to remove the Indictment into this Court, with a View to have a Trial by a foreign Jury. The Certiorari was directed to the Clerk of the Oyer and Termi-ner, and returned by him with the Indi ctment annexed, and the following Questions occurring : 1 st, Whether a Certiorari to remove an Indictment for Felony could be allowed, otherwife than on motion in open Court, and special Cause shewn ? 2dly, Whether a Certiorari to remove an Indictment from the Oyer and Terminer ought not to be directed to and returned by the Commissioners instead of the Clerk ? 3dly, If the Certiorari in the present Cafe should be received and filed in this Court, then how and where must the Trial be ? whether by Procedendo to the Oyer and Terminer, or by nifi, prius at the Circuit, or at Bar ? and whether a foreign Jury could be awarded in a capital Cafe ? the Court permitted the Certiorari and Return to be lodged only in Court for the prefent, but not as either formally received or filed ; the Defendant however, having submitted the affidavit on which he should ground his Motion for a foreign Jury, to the previous examination of the Judges, and they deeming it insufficient, no Opinion was therefore given on either of the above Questions, and the following Order was entered
B.