← Cases

Child v. Murray

1 Cole. Cas. 59 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. English

Contents

Majority

p. 59
Child vs. Murray, manucaptor.

Headnote

IN fci. fa. on recognizance of bail and inqueft • thereon, the jury aíK'ííed ínterull from the docketting of the original judgment, to the return of the pojlea.
p. 60
To {how that this was the juft method of computing intereft, the following authorities were cited: % Dura. & Eaft. 57. 10 Mod. Rep. 278. notes. 8 Id. 336. 358.

The plaintiff is entitled to have in-tereft calculated again!! the bail, from the day they become fixed. By this the Court mean, after the expiration of the time allowed ex gratia to furren-der, that is, eight days after capias returned.