Majority
p. 484Jackson, ex dem. Edson and another against Gayer. moved for a view, which being successfully opposed by Z. R. Ship herd, the Court ' directed a rule to be entered that the motion be denied, with . , ' ' out saying any thing about costs, asked for the costs of .opposing.
Headnote
rule for deng carries s of course, icon-ex-n theH. H. Ross, for the defendant,
Shipherd,
Wherever the rule is entered, that a motion be denied, the costs of opposing the motion follow of course, in all cases except where the contrary is expressed in the rule.[1]
(a) (a) Vid. Williams v. Smith, 2 Caines’ Rep. 253 .