Majority
Headnote
In partition. The defendants brought a writ of error from this court, but did not put in bail. There was also a defect in the writ of error ; but the court for the correetion of errors allowed it to be amended, and retained the cause. Before the amendment was allowed, the plaintiff issued two writs of fi. fa. one against Clapp, and one against oioners unknown, for different portions of the costs in partition.By the statute, (1 R. L.512, s. 12,) “error may be brought within the same time, and under the like restrictions and regulations, as in other cases.” This undoubtedly refers to the restrictions and regulations in the previous act “ concerning writs of error,” &c. (1 R. L. 143.). Independent of that act, there is no restriction on the subject. The writ is one of right, and issues of course, in all actions, real, personal and mixéd. That act requires two things on bringing error from this court; the certificate of counsel, and bail. The former is not necessary on error from the common pleas to this court; and had this writ been from a judgment in partition, rendered in the common pleas, there would be nothing, (not even the certificate.) to satisfy the rvords quoted from the staf-
But the point is new in practice, and the party proceeded in good faith. Eet the executions, therefore, be set aside, on payment of costs, and putting in and perfecting, bail in error.
Rule accordingly.