Law v. Jackson ex dem. Lansing — 9 Cow. 640

Majority

p. 670

*John Law and Andrew Nelson, plaintiffs in error, against James Jackson ex dem. Jacob Lansing, defendant in error.

ALBANY,

Dec. 1827.

Headnote

A tender of money due upon a judgment, does not, per se, discharge it, or take away the lien of the judgment creditor; hut he may still redeem upon it as a judgment creditor, within the statute, (sess. 43, ch. 184, C3.)^[1]

On error from the supreme court. 5 Cowen, 248, S. C. by the title of Jackson, ex dem. Lansing^ ti. Law and Nélson. The cause was argued here by

J. Crary D. Russell, for the plaintiffs ir. error, and'

Jacob Lansing & S. M. Hopkins, contra.

delivered an opinion in favor of affirming the judgment below.

p. 671

Allen, Burrows, Elsworth, Enos, Gardiner, Hager, Haight, Hart, Jordan, Livingston, McCarty, McMartin, Smith, Spencer, and Waterman, Senators, concurred.

For reversal—Dayan, Lake, McCall, Oliver and Wilkeson, Senators.

Judgment affirmed.

END OP CASES IN ERBOR.

I

p. 672