Majority
Headnote
The lien of an attorney on a judgment for costs, and his rights as assignee of such judgment, are subject to the equitable right of the party against whom such judgment has been obtained to offset against it a judgment in his favor against such client, the assignor. Such offset will generally be granted when the client is insolvent.The lien of the attorney has, in this State, always been regarded as subject to the equitable right of set-off between the parties. I adverted to this distinction in Ward v. Wordsworth (1 E. D. Smith, 603) as settled by the cases of Spencer v. White (1 Johns. Cases, 102), Pindar v. Morris ( 3 Cai. 165 ) and The People, &c., v. Manning ( 13 Wend. 652 ), and it was upheld in Roberts v. Carter ( 24 How. Pr. 44 ) and Brooks v. Handford ( 15 Abb. Pr. 342 ).
The decision below, therefore, must be affirmed, there being no question where the defendant is insolvent, but that it is equitable to order the set-off. (Rignolet v. Greer, 19 Abb. Pr. 264 ; Bradley v. Angell, 3.N. Y. 475.)
Yah Hoesen, J., concurred.
Order affirmed.
Cases cited
- Pinder v. Morris 3 Cai. 165 p. 184
- Roberts v. Carter 24 How. Pr. 44 p. 184
- Pignolet v. Geer 19 Abb. Pr. 264 p. 184