Majority
Headnote
Things attached to the freehold are not the subject of larceny.charged the jury, that the question whether this was or was not a larceny, did not depend on the prisoner laying down the pipes and taking them up again, but whether the severing and carrying away was one continuous transaction. Larceny is the felonious stealing, taking and carrying away the personal goods of another. If these pipes were not, when carried off, the personal goods of Duncan & Woolaston, they could not be stolen. As apart of the realty, they were not under the protection of the criminal law, so as to make the taking of them a felony. It was but a trespass. Whilst a part of the engine, which was itself a part of the building, they were a part of the building; and, if tbes taken and carried away, by one act of severance and separation, it did not come within the definition of larceny, not being a stealing and carrying away of personal property. But if they were severed by the defendant, or by another, at one time, so that they became personal property, and after they assumed this new character, were taken and carried away by him with a felonious intent, it was a case of 'larceny, and the prisoner ought to be convicted.
Verdict—guilty.