← Cases

Pepper v. Pepper

7 Del. 286 2 Houst. 286 Court Del. Super. Ct. English

Contents

Majority

p. 286
Asbury C. Pepper v. David Pepper, et al.

Headnote

In an action of trespass for assault and battery, a co-trespasser joined in the writ, but returned non est, and not a party for that reason to the action, is a competent witness for the defendants.
Action of trespass for assault and battery. On the trial of the case, Zachariah Jones was called as a witness for the defendants and was objected to by the counsel for the plaintiff, on the ground of incompetency, because he was a co-trespasser with the other defendants, and had been joined as a co-defendant with them in the writ, but as to whom it had been returned non est, and who had not appeared and who was therefore not formally a party to the action, by reason of his having evaded and eluded the service of the process, for the purpose of becoming a witness for them.

We must admit the witness. ' Formerly as the law and the decisions stood on this point, he would have been excluded ; but it is now settled to the contrary, and has been so recognized by this court. Clark v. Maloney, 3 Harr. 68 . Stockton v. Jones et al. 10 Johns, 21 . 1 Greenl. Ev. 476.

C. M. Cullen, for plaintiff.

W. Saulsbury, for defendants.'

Cases cited