Majority
p. 13MARY TRAIN, Administratrix of D. Train, v. GEORGE CONWELL, FISHER CONWELL and ELIAS CONWELL, Executors of Elias Conwell. Supreme Court. November, 1793. Wilson’s Red Book, 8.[1]
The cases cited for defendants show that a judgment confessed by one executor where there are more may be reversed, but still it is a judgment, and therefore supports the plaintiff against the plea; but we do not say what we should, do if the other executors came before us upon the execution.