Majority
p. 429COOPER, Assignee, v. LOFTIS. Supreme Court. Kent. March, 1797. Bayard’s Notebook, 186.
Ridgely for plaintiff. Miller and Bayard for defendant.
In this case it was ruled by the Court that if an executor pay or deliver a sum of money or chattel to a person immediately entitled to the possession, he or his securities were not liable afterwards to any person claiming a future or contingent interest in the same property.