← Cases

Kinsely v. Cox

2 Del. Cas. 374 Court Orphans’ Court. Decision date 1818-02-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 374
MARY KINSELY and LYDIA KINSELY, Infants, Children of Dr. Kinsely, by JOHN KINSELY, their Next Friend, v. NATHAN COX, their Guardian.
Orphans’ Court.
February 21, 1818.
Ridgely’s Notebook II, 16.
Amos Kinsely, witness. In the Winter of 1817 Samuel Thomas, who lived in Cook House on the farm, put into firewood rail timber (one time I saw) which had been peeled into firewood. Timber had been fallen in Spring of 1817, while Nathan Cox lived on the land. There were a good many timber trees laying peeled in this manner. I don’t know who barked trees, but I saw in the Spring Nathan Cox drawing bark. There was a ridge taken in the field to support the farm with rails, which ridge is cut down, and timber taken off the ridge was half an acre. There is an island with white oaks adjoining the cleared land, four large trees, and other small ones have been cut down. Don’t know who cut the trees; some of it was split into rails, and some nice straight timber very good for rails was split into firewood.
p. 375
Daniel Vorhil, witness for complainant. There was a waste in cutting the ridge and white oaks cut last spring and last winter, since Nathan Cox went there. Ridge about three-quarter acres.
Thomas Soward, for respondent. We, the freeholders, included this ridge in the ten acres to be cleared. The rails have been put on the fence, and still it is not good, the rails will show for themselves. The white oaks were used for well purchase. The well had fallen in. The place is in far better repair than when Nathan Cox went there.
Nathan Green, witness for respondent. The grove in the field we considered to be cut. The white oaks were well worked into rails and trunnels and were well worked and used arid the farm is a good deal better than it was before Nathan Cox went there.

Petition dismissed.