p. 224ELEUTHERE IRENEE DU PONT, JACQUES BIDERMAN AND BUREAU DE PUSY v. PETER BAUDUY. Court of Chancery. New Castle. Account begins, Ridgely’s Notebook III, 466.
Hearing on the cross-bill exceptions above. Counsel for Bauduy (defendant to this cross-bill) argues that the Court of Chancery
p. 225(At this point, the report ends abruptly.)
has no jurisdiction in this cause since there is an adequate remedy at law. Counsel for Du Pont, (complainant in cross-bill) maintains that defendant cannot ignore the cross-bill, but can be required to plead, answer, or demur.