Majority
Headnote
Bill for an injunction and an account. Upon the petition of the complainant, an infant, &c.,by his guardian, under the oath of the guardian and of her husband, (the guardian being a married woman), setting forth that the defendant “ threatens and intends to leave the State of Delaware and to withdraw himself out of the jurisdiction of the Court,” and that deponents believe that he is indebted to the complainant in the sum of $8000.00 and upwards,—a ne exeat ordered.considered that a writ of ne exeat should be granted. The affidavit of the threats by dedefendant to leave the State was made directly, and not upon information and belief only: and it was, therefore, within the rule of the decisions. Roddam vs. Hetherington, 5 Ves. Jr. 91 n: Oldham vs. Oldham, 7 Ves. Jr. 410 : Etches vs. Lance, 7 Ves. Jr. 417 : Hannay vs. McEntire, 11 Ves. Jr. 54 : Jones vs. Alephsin 16 Ves. Jr. 470. With respect to the indebtedness, as the claim of the complainant rested in account, and was peculiarly within the defendant’s own knowledge, the Chancellor considered it sufficient that the deponents had sworn to their belief that the defendant was indebted in a sum certain, viz : $3000. Rico vs. Gaultier, 3 Atk. 501 : Russell vs. Ashby, 5 Ves. Jr. 96.
It was ordered, that a writ of ne exeat issue, and that the defendant be held to give security to the amount of $3,000.00.
See Clayton, et al., vs. Mitchell, ante, p. 32.