Majority
p. 417Anonymous.
Headnote
A replevin bond in a suit by an infant is valid, though executed by Wsprochein ami as one of the two sureties required by statute.In replevin by an infant, his next friend by whom he sued became one of the two sureties for the plaintiff; and it was objected that he was a party, and so the bond came within the case, (vid. Graham's Pr. 890,)[1] which
p. 418
holds, there must be two sureties independently of the party; but
held he was not a party, but rather in the nature of an attorney; and so the proceedings were well enough.
Motion denied: