Brown v. Wesson

Headnote

An action in trover before a justice of the peace, in which a promissory note was introduced and proved as the amount of damages claimed, and was delivered up and canceled on the trial, and judgment in trover was rendered for that amount against the defendants, they not appearing to defend; the defendants on an ex parte application, procured a common law certiorari to remove the proceedings into this court: And on a motion by defendants in error to quash the certiorari on the ground that it appeared the principal ground of the plaintiffs in error, was, that the proof before the justice was not sufficient to warrant a judgment in trover, and that the action should have been assumpsit; it was held that such a question could not be reached by a common law certiorari; and motion was granted with costs.

Motion by defendants in error to quash a common law certiorari.— On the 7th March last, this court granted a common law certiorari in this cause, on the ex parte application of plaintiffs in error; said certiorari was directed to the common pleas of Chenango county; the motion was founded on the affidavit of Nelson Brown, one of the plaintiffs in error: to which was annexed the papers used in the common pleas on motion to set aside the execution issued by the clerk of Chenango county, and for a perpetual stay of proceedings on said execution. The papers on which said motion in the common pleas was founded, showed that the plaintiffs in error were sued by the defendants in error in justice’s court in Oxford, and that the declaration in the justice’s court was in trover for boots and shoes, obtained by false pretences; a note was given by defendants for the boots and shoes, which note was delivered to the justice to be canceled on the trial. The defendants did not appear in the justice’s court, and judgment for plaintiffs for damages and costs, $66-76, on the 9th October, 1843, was rendered against them, a transcript filed and execution issued by the clerk of Chenango county. The evidence before the justice appeared with the papers. The affidavit of Nelson Brown, upon which the certiorari was granted, stated “ that he believed an improper and fraudulent attempt was made in said cause to convert a contract debt into a tort, and that the defendants (plaintiffs in error), applied to the common pleas for relief by motion, and they granted an order staying proceedings to enable the defendants (plaintiffs in error), to bring these proceedings before this court by a common law certiorari.” This motion to quash said certiorari was founded upon the papers on which the said certiorari was allowed, and also upon the affidavits of Henry R. Mygatt (attorney), and Austin Hyde (judge of common pleas), and thereto are annexed the affidavits of said attorney, and Uri Tracy (justice), used in common pleas to resist said motion and orders of court below. The jus

tices’ affidavit used to resist the motion in the common pleas stated, that the judgment was rendered in trover; and that the plaintiffs’ attorney brought to court a declaration part printed and part written in trover; and the affidavit of the attorney stated an admission made by defendants in justice’s court. The common pleas denied the motion with costs, and directed an alias execution to issue; after the motion was decided, they granted time to move for a certiorari or mandamus. The affidavits of the attorney (Mygatt), and the judge (Hyde), upon this motion, showed that the motion in the common pleas was resisted upon two affidavits above stated, and that said two orders were entered. Hyde was one of the judges who presided on the motion, and he stated that “ the counsel of said Brown and Fitch assumed among other grounds, that the evidence before the justice was not sufficient to sustain trover, and that the action should have been in'assumpsit and not in trover.” The affidavit Of attorney (Mygatt) stated that no notice was given for said motion for certiorari, and that he expected notice, and that the costs ($7), in the common pleas directed to be paid on denying the motion had not been paid.