Majority
Headnote
Upon an application for judgment on account of the frivolousness of the pleading under § 247 of the Code, the weight of authority is against allowing a trial fee of $15. Costs of a motion, $10 only, can be allowed.The weight of authority is against this allowance of $15 for a trial fee. In Gould agt. Carpenter, (7 How. Pr. R., 97,) Justice Harris decided that the hearing of such application was not a trial. In Lawrence agt. Davis, (id., 354,) Justice Roosevelt decided that the full costs of a trial were recoverable. The same decision was made in Roberts agt. Morrison, (id., 396,) by Morris, Justice.
In Roberts agt. Clark, ( 10 How., 451 ,) Justice Welles held such application to be a motion, and that the prevailing party could only have motion costs. In Marquiser agt. Bingham, ( 12 How., 399 ,) Justice Balcom, upon a motion for judgment upon the ground that the answer was frivolous, held that the costs of a motion, $10 only, could be allowed.
In the Rochester City Bank agt. Rapelje, ( 12 How., 26 ,) it was decided by the general term in the 7th district that upon such an application there was no trial of an issue as defined by the Code; that if the judge does not see the
The order of the special term must be reversed, and the trial fee, $15, disallowed.