The judgment of Laskin C.J. and Spence and Dickson JJ. was delivered by
The reasons of Pigeon, Beetz and Pratte JJ. in which Martland and Ritchie JJ. also concurred were delivered by
The reasons of Martland and Ritchie JJ. was delivered by
The following are the reasons delivered by—
Footnotes
- [1] (1977), 18 N.S.R. (2d) 592.
- [2] (1977), 18 N.S.R. (2d) 615.
- [3] [1930] S.C.R. 120.
- [4] [1956] O.R. 379.
- [5] [1968] 2 O.R. 245.
- [6] (1961), 29 D.L.R. (2d) 76 aff'd [1962] S.C.R. 318.
- [7] [1975] 1 S.C.R. 630.
- [8] [1923] A.C. 395.
- [9] [1970] S.C.R. 425.
- [10] [1969] 2 A.C. 147.
- [11] [1957] O.R. 316.
- [12] [1953] 2 S.C.R. 140.
- [13] [1962] O.R. 17.
- [14] [1968] S.C.R. 113.
- [15] [1960] S.C.R. 235.
- [16] [1933] A.C. 592.
- [17] (1972), 46 A.L.J.R. 391.
- [18] [1952] 1 K.B. 338.
- [19] (1802), 3 East 18, 102 E.R. 502.
- [20] (1857), 3 C.B. (N.S.) 189; 140 E.R. 712.
- [21] (1889), 18 S.C.R. 280.
- [22] (1847), 9 L.T. (O.S.) 199.
- [23] [1913] 2 K.B. 32.
- [24] [1974] S.C.R. 335.
- [25] (1927), 33 A.L.R. 245.
- [26] [1922] 1 A.C. 268.
- [27] [1960] S.C.R. 539.
- [28] [1936] 2 All E.R. 191.
- [29] [1953] 1 All E.R. 843.
- [30] [1891] 1 Q.B. 245.
- [31] (1934), 150 L.T. 327.
- [32] [1974] S.C.R. 335.
- [33] [1979] 1 S.C.R. 846.
- [34] [1976] 1 S.C.R. 2.
- [35] [1975] 1 S.C.R. 517.
- [36] (1847), 9 L.T. (O.S.) 199.
- [37] [1979] 2 S.C.R. 227.
- [38] [1975] 1 S.C.R. 630.
- [39] [1923] A.C. 395.
- [40] [1933] A.C. 592.
- [41] [1975] 1 S.C.R. 630.
- [42] [1923] A.C. 395.
- [43] [1933] A.C. 592.
- [44] [1960] S.C.R. 539.
- [45] (1857), 3 C.B. (N.S.) 189.
- [46] [1913] 2 K.B. 32.
- [47] [1923] A.C. 395.
Cases cited
- 18 N.S.R. (2d) 615 18 N.S.R. (2d) 615 ¶ 2
- City of Toronto v. Thompson scr-1930-120 ¶ 3
- O.R. 379 O.R. 379 ¶ 4
- 2 O.R. 245 2 O.R. 245 ¶ 5
- 29 D.L.R. (2d) 76 29 D.L.R. (2d) 76 ¶ 6
- Howe Sound Company v. International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers (Canada) Local scr-1962-318 ¶ 6
- Toronto Police Association v. Board of Commissioners item-4272-1974-04-29 ¶ 7
- A.C. 395 A.C. 395 ¶ 8