← Cases

Assessor for Port Alberni v. MacMillan Bloedel et al.

[1974] SCR 83 Court SCC Decision date 1973-05-28 English

PartiesThe Assessor for the Corporation of the City of Port Alberni Appellant·MacMillan Bloedel Limited, MacMillan Bloedel (Alberni) Ltd., MacMillan Bloedel Industries Limited Respondents

Counsel (4)
Robert R. Dodd and Donald J. Sorochan, for the appellant.
A.C. Robertson, for the respondents.
Solicitors for the appellant: Andrews & Swinton, Vancouver.
Solicitors for the respondents: Davis, Hossie, Campbell, Brazier & McLorg, Vancouver.

Judges Martland, Ronald; Judson, Wilfred; Spence, Wishart Flett; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Laskin, Bora

Delivered by Majority

On appeal from British Columbia

Subjects Taxation

Contents

The judgment of Martland, Spence, Pigeon and Laskin JJ. was delivered by

Attached hereto is By-Law No. 3036 passed by the Respondent pursuant to Section 427 of the Municipal Act and which by Section 2(2) levies a Business Tax in respect of the calendar year ending December 31, 1972, of
…either an amount equal to seven (7%) per centum of the annual rental value of the real property occupied or used for the purpose of carrying on such business, or an amount equal to seven tenths (7/10) of one per centum of the taxable value of personal property used by him in or on the real property for the purpose of the said business, whichever produces the greater amount of tax.
The Respondent issued to the Appellants 1972 Business Tax Assessment Notices with respect to four businesses in the City of Port Alberni owned and occupied by the Appellants, particulars of which assessments are as follows:
ASSESSMENTS
Business
Roll No.
Annual Rental Value
Taxable Personal Property
Alberni Plywood Division
200
275,000
1,875,911
Alberni Pacific Division
201
247,000
1,285,683
Somass Division
202
672,500
2,920,718
Alberni Pulp & Paper Division
203
4,576,500
25,765,425
The Respondent assessed the Annual Rental Value of each of the said businesses by:
(a) Doubling the assessed values of the lands and improvements for the 1972 General Assessment Roll in order to arrive at the actual value of the said lands and improvements,
(b) Applying a capitalization rate of Six Percent (6%) to the actual value of the lands and a capitalization rate of Eight Percent (8%) to the actual value of the improvements in order to arrive at the return which a prudent investor might expect to receive on such an investment,
(c) Adding to such return the amount of the 1972 real property taxes payable in respect of such lands and improvements.
For the purposes of the General Assessment Roll, there was deducted from the assessed values of the lands and improvements, the assessed values of those portions thereof used exclusively for pollution abate-

[Page 87]

ment within the meaning of Section 327(1) (p) of the Municipal Act, which deductions for 1972 were as follows:
ASSESSED VALUE OF DEDUTIONS UNDER SECTION 327 (1) (p)
Business
Lands
Improvements
Alberni Plywood Division
Nil
Nil
Alberni Pacific Division
Nil
18,500
Somass Division
Nil
38,740
Alberni Pulp & Paper Division
4,620
986,217
No such deductions were made from the assessed values of the lands and improvements for determining Annual Rental Value under paragraph 3 hereof.
The issues for determination on this Appeal are whether in assessing Annual Rental Value for the purpose of Section 427 of the Municipal Act:
(a) The assessor was correct in taking into consideration the real property taxes payable in respect of the lands and improvements in arriving at the annual rental value of the lands and improvements.
(b) The Assessor was correct in not deducting from the actual value of the properties an amount equal to the actual value of land and improvements used solely for pollution control, within the meaning of section 327 (i) (p) of the “Municipal Act”.
The Appellants appealed their 1972 assessments for Business Tax purposes on the said businesses to the Court of Revision sitting in the City of Port Alberni which appeals were dismissed on March 9, 1972. The Appellants served Notice of intention to appeal the assessments upon the Municipal Clerk of the Respondent and have brought this Appeal in conformity with and within the times limited by Section 362 of the Municipal Act.

Footnotes

  1. [1] [1972] 5 W.W.R. 515, 28 D.L.R. (3d) 688.
  2. [2] [1950] 1 W.W.R.961, [1950] 1 D.L.R. 754.
  3. [3] [1937] 2 W.W.R. 90, [1937] 3 D.L.R. 496.
  4. [4] [1937] 2 W.W.R. 351, [1937] 3 D.L.R. 446.
  5. [5] (1969), 1 N.B.R. (2d) 488, 6 D.L.R. (3d) 536.
  6. [6] (1872), L.R. 7 Ex.409.
  7. [7] (1883), 9 App. Cas. 49 (H.L.).
  8. [8] [1894] 2 Q.B. 90.
  9. [9] (1883), 9 App. Cas. 49.
  10. [10] (1872), L. R. 7 Ex.409.

Statutes and regulations cited

  • Unresolved citations