← Cases

Eastern Canada Shipping Ltd. v. R.

[1974] SCR 824 Court SCC Decision date 1972-11-06 English

PartiesEastern Canada Shipping Ltd. Appellant·Her Majesty the Queen Respondent

Counsel (4)
Jack Greenstein and Michel Jetté, for the appellant.
François Mercier, Q.C., for the respondent.
Solicitors for the appellant: Geoffrion & Prud’homme, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondent: Stikeman, Elliott & Associates, Montreal.

Judges Fauteux, Joseph Honoré Gérald; Abbott, Douglas Charles; Judson, Wilfred; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe

Delivered by Judgment of the Court

On appeal from Canada

Subjects Torts

Contents

Judgment of the Court

The judgment of the Court was delivered by

THE CHIEF JUSTICE—The subject matter of this appeal is the quantum of damages to which appellant may be entitled as a result of the decision of the Minister of Transport of Canada to close to navigation the eastern section of the Lachine Canal after February 1st, 1965. Appellant had been conducting, since 1958, what was mainly stevedoring operations along that section of the Canal on land leased from The St. Lawrence Seaway Authority. As a result of that decision, appellant had to relocate its operations in the Port of Montreal, while still using in part its facilities on the leased premises.
The trial judge awarded appellant a sum of $44,000 for the said damages, and the latter now seeks to have that amount increased.
Having heard and considered the arguments by counsel for the parties, we do not feel justified in interfering with the conclusion reached at trial with respect to the quantum, which is here a question of fact.
[Page 825]
I would, therefore, dismiss the appeal with costs.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Solicitors for the appellant: Geoffrion & Prud’homme, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondent: Stikeman, Elliott & Associates, Montreal.

Footnotes

  1. [1] [1969] 1 Ex. C.R. 461.