Congoleum Canada Ltd. et al. v. Montreal Urban Community et al.

[1981] 1 SCR 280 Court SCC Decision date 1981-03-25 English

PartiesCongoleum Canada Ltd., Metrocan Leasing Ltd., Domco Industries Ltée and Les Ensembles Urbains Ltée (Applicants) Appellants·Montreal Urban Community and the City of Montreal Respondents·Quebec Real Estate Revision Board Mis en cause

Counsel (6)

Jacques Viau, Q.C., and Paul Demers, for the applicants, appellants.
Gérard Beaupré, Q.C., and Bernard Taillefer, for the respondent Montreal Urban Community.
Jeanne Nobert, for the respondent City of Montreal.
Solicitors for the applicants, appellants: Colby, Rioux, Demers & Smiley, Montreal and Viau, Bélanger & Associés, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondent Montreal Urban Community: Beaupré, Trudeau, Sylvestre, Taillefer & Léger, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondent City of Montreal: Péloquin, Badeaux, Allard & Lacroix, Montreal.

Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio

Decision 4–1 Majority (4) · DICKSON J. (1)

On appeal from Quebec

Subjects Municipal law

Contents

Majority

English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by

DICKSON J.

DICKSON J.—We have not been persuaded by appellants that there is a basis for intervention by this Court with respect to the way the Court of

[Page 281]

Appeal disposed of these matters and we are all of the opinion that the appeal from the three judgments of the Court, of Appeal must be dismissed. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitors for the applicants, appellants: Colby, Rioux, Demers & Smiley, Montreal and Viau, Bélanger & Associés, Montreal.

Solicitors for the respondent Montreal Urban Community: Beaupré, Trudeau, Sylvestre, Taillefer & Léger, Montreal.

Solicitors for the respondent City of Montreal: Péloquin, Badeaux, Allard & Lacroix, Montreal.

Footnotes

[1] [1979] C.A. 392.
[2] [1976] C.P. 351.