Hyperlawhypertext legal database Rental Commission et al. v. Sand et al. [1980] 2 SCR 100

← Cases

Rental Commission et al. v. Sand et al.

[1980] 2 SCR 100 Court SCC Decision date 1980-05-07 English

PartiesThe Rental Commission, Jean Geoffrion, Q.C. and George Bey, Q.C. Appellants·G. George Sand et al. Respondents·Rockhill Investments Ltd. Mis en cause

Counsel (6)
Paule Lafontaine and Robert Monette, for the appellants.
James Khazzam, for the respondents.
David I. Schatia, for the mis en cause.
Solicitors for the appellants: Boissonneault, Roy & Poulin, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondents: Spiegel & Kravetz, Montreal.
Solicitors for the mis en cause: Schatia & Sazant, Montreal.

Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio

Decision 4–1 Majority (4) · DICKSON J. (1)

On appeal from Quebec

Subjects Administrative law

Contents

Majority

English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by

DICKSON J.

DICKSON J.—It will not be necessary to hear you, Mr. Khazzam. We are all of the opinion that no error has been demonstrated in the decision of the Court of Appeal. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with costs.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Solicitors for the appellants: Boissonneault, Roy & Poulin, Montreal.
Solicitors for the respondents: Spiegel & Kravetz, Montreal.
Solicitors for the mis en cause: Schatia & Sazant, Montreal.

Footnotes

  1. [1] C.A.M. 500-09-00878-785, January 25, 1977.
  2. [2] S.C.M. 500-05-131390-788, June 28, 1978.